Economy

Chancellor John Healey faces serious challenges in funding Burnham’s grand aspirations

The Conversation Africa July 22, 2026

Chancellor John Healey faces serious challenges in funding Burnham’s grand aspirations Search analysis, research,

academics… Home Arts + Culture Economy Education Environment + Energy Ethics + Religion Health Politics + Society

Science + Tech World Podcasts Local En Español Edition Africa Australia Brasil Canada Canada (français) Català

España Europe France Global Indonesia New Zealand United Kingdom United States Donate Skip to content Edition: United

States Africa Australia Brasil Canada Canada (français) Català España Europe France Global Indonesia New Zealand

United Kingdom s Donate Newsletters Academic rigor, journalistic flair Arts + Culture Economy Education Environment +

Energy Ethics + Religion Health Politics + Society Science + Tech World Podcasts Local EPA/ANDY RAIN Chancellor John

Healey faces serious challenges in funding Burnham’s grand aspirations Published: July 22, 2026 2:51am EDT

https://theconversation.com/chancellor-john-healey-faces-serious-challenges-in-funding-burnhams-grand-aspirations-288005

Link copied Share article Share article Copy link Email Bluesky Facebook WhatsApp Messenger LinkedIn X (Twitter) Print

article The UK’s new prime minister, Andy Burnham, laid out a radical agenda in his short speech upon taking office.

He called for a long-term strategy to reverse 40 years of Thatcherism, and the privatisation and centralisation that

resulted. Wisely, he put a ten-year horizon on these objectives and it is now up to his new chancellor, John Healey, to

realise his ambitions. Sensibly, Burnham has also announced less costly but limited measures to deal with the cost of

living and the housing crisis – intended to convince the public that he understands their concerns. So far these

include a pledge to cap single bus fares in England at £2, cut VAT on electricity bills from October, and end rough

sleeping (with no time frame specified). The government said that the cut in energy bills is fully funded by scrapping

plans for digital IDs. But spending watchdog the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has pointed out that the funding

for this was set to be covered by further, albeit modest, cuts to other government departments. Read more: John Healey

is the UK’s chancellor: what Burnham’s surprise pick says about his style of government By appointing Healey,

Burnham has reassured the bond markets, which feared the more leftwing Ed Miliband would become chancellor. Healey

resigned as defence secretary in June, which played a major role in Keir Starmer’s resignation. His exit was caused by

the Treasury refusing to find the funds to allow the UK to reach Nato’s defence spending target of 3% of GDP. Now it

will be Healey’s job to find this money. Other long-term goals will be just as expensive. Building council housing,

fixing social care and acquiring privatised companies will all make a considerable dent in the government’s finances.

These have already been weakened by the effects of the Iran war, with growth this year projected to be just 1%. Like all

chancellors, Healey’s central aim must be to boost long-term growth and productivity. This is the only way to ensure

prosperity for voters and enough funds to improve public services without increasing government debt. Although Burnham

has pledged to abide by the fiscal rules and Labour’s promise not to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance, the

chancellor will be able to find a number of tweaks that give him room for manoeuvre – just as chancellor, Rachel

Reeves revised the fiscal rules in a way that eased restrictions on borrowing money in order to invest. Many new

policies, from building council housing to funding social care and training for young people, have long-term benefits to

the economy. There could be an argument for reclassifying these as investment spending. In the case of council housing,

it is actually providing the government with a valuable physical asset. Time for a wealth tax? Meanwhile, there are also

many ways to increase revenue without breaking Labour’s taxes pledge. Burnham’s main focus is likely to be further

taxation of wealth, which might aim to equalise rates with taxation on earned income. Tax relief on private pensions,

which mainly benefit the better-off, could also be a target. And changes to the top rate of income tax, if it was

balanced by an increase in the personal allowance to ensure people on the basic state pension do not pay income tax,

could be popular. The most contentious issue will be the taxation of property. Broadly, the reform of council tax –

the system introduced by the Thatcher government and still based on property valuations made more than 30 years ago –

would sharply increase costs in rich areas like London and the south east, while easing burdens further north. But that

would have to be accompanied by a redistribution of funds to northern councils, which would otherwise see their revenues

fall sharply. This points to the broader question facing the Treasury – and the government – on how to carry out a

meaningful devolution to the regions. It is likely to mean giving some of central government’s revenues – such as

income tax – to regional authorities. They could also be given powers, like in Scotland, to raise income tax in their

region. There are also some fixes that could reduce the government’s deficit – the difference between what it brings

in and what it spends. Firstly, key policies such as social care could be funded by a special tax on housing, as Burnham

himself proposed in 2010 when he was health secretary. And some of the huge increase in defence spending might be funded

jointly by a number of Nato countries issuing a common defence bond, which might lower borrowing costs and may not be

counted as part of UK government debt. Finally, the government could gain effective control of failing private

utilities, such as Thames Water, without fully nationalising them. Rates relief for small businesses, including pubs,

could be popular. EPA/ANDY RAIN Like all chancellors, Healey will have to balance the need for more spending with

voters’ desire for lower taxes. It will take a clever politician to square this circle, given the weakness of the UK

economy and that of its key trading partners. One route to achieving these objectives without upsetting the markets is

to put forward measures that show it is on the side of the people, while announcing revenue-raising measures aimed at

more unpopular targets. For example, a cut in rates for small businesses (especially pubs) in northern cities could be

popular, and might be funded by higher taxation of warehouses owned by retail giants. Devolution could also help by

pushing responsibility to the local level. Voters would then be able to see the benefits in their own communities. And

giving councils a bigger role in welfare reform may pay off if investment in training and mental health support led to a

national reduction in the welfare bill. This will be one of Healey’s key objectives, as well as being a major concern

for the markets and the OBR. So far the markets have adopted a “wait and see” approach to the Burnham government.

The autumn budget could be crucial in determining whether the new administration has a credible long-term economic

strategy that can win both public support and market acceptance. UK economy UK government Andy Burnham Steve Schifferes,

City St George's, University of London Author Steve Schifferes Honorary Research Fellow, City Political Economy

Research Centre, City St George's, University of London Disclosure statement Steve Schifferes does not work for,

consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has

disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Partners City St George's, University of

London provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation UK. View all partners DOI

https://doi.org/10.64628/AB.ddf6fjgap Want to write? Write an article and join a growing community of more than 230,000

academics and researchers from 5,568 institutions. Register now Editorial Policies Community standards Republishing

guidelines Friends of The Conversation Analytics Our feeds Donate Get newsletter Who we are Our charter Our team

Partners and funders Resource for media Work for us En Español Contact us

Inc.

Source: theconversation.com