Getting Away with Murder: Under Trump, the Buck Stops Nowhere - LewRockwell Skip to content Open main menu
ArchivesAuthorsBlogBooks & ResourcesLew Rockwell BooksRon Paul BooksMurray N. Rothbard Library & ResourcesMises
InstituteLRC Bestselling BooksPolitical TheatrePodcastsStoreAboutContactDonateAdvertise Getting Away with Murder: Under
Trump, the Buck Stops Nowhere By John & Nisha WhiteheadThe Rutherford Institute July 24, 2026 “If you kill
Americans, if you threaten Americans anywhere on Earth, we will hunt you down without apology and without hesitation
and we will kill you.”— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Having burned through billions of dollars and depleted
critical munitions stockpiles, the Pentagon is running out of money. Our money. According to the Washington
Post, the Pentagon is facing an urgent budget shortfall caused largely by the Iran war, with some critical funding
accounts expected to run dry within weeks. Training, maintenance and other military priorities are reportedly being
squeezed as the government struggles to sustain Trump’s escalating conflict. Once again, the government is looking to
the American people for a taxpayer-funded bailout—this time to the tune of $67 billion. Nor is the $67 billion
emergency infusion the end of it. Trump’s fiscal year 2027 budget calls for an unprecedented $1.5 trillion in
national-defense spending—a staggering increase that would pour still more money into a military apparatus that cannot
account honestly for the costs of its current war, maintain its existing priorities, or keep from returning to taxpayers
for another bailout. The problem is not simply how much the war machine consumes. It is how little accountability
accompanies that spending. The government can launch a war, exhaust military resources, conceal its full costs, and
return to Congress for billions more without anyone responsible being required to admit error, change course, or answer
for the lives lost. That is becoming a familiar pattern under Donald Trump. He makes the decisions—others absorb the
consequences. He launches the war—the troops make the sacrifices, and taxpayers inherit the bill. The Iran war is not
merely another example of government waste, although the cost is already staggering. The war has already cost an
estimated $80 to $100 billion, not counting its long-term economic impact, future veteran expenses, or the cost of
repairing damaged military bases. Analysts estimate that the broader toll on American households could eventually reach
as much as $1,000 per household. Yet the true cost cannot be measured in dollars alone. American service members are
dying in a war Trump started without meaningful congressional authorization, without a credible plan for ending it, and
without an honest accounting of what it will cost. The Pentagon is draining resources from training, maintenance and
weapons programs to keep the conflict going. Congress is being asked to supply billions more. And the American
people—already struggling under the weight of debt, inflation and economic uncertainty—are expected to pay without
question. This is government without accountability. It is also the Trump business model applied to government: take the
risks, claim the credit, transfer the losses and leave someone else to clean up the wreckage. Trump has spent a lifetime
marketing himself as a brilliant businessman, yet his record is littered with bankruptcies, defaults, failed ventures
and losses shifted onto others. In private business, a failed venture can be abandoned and its consequences
transferred. A president’s failures are not so easily contained, yet Trump continues to govern as though America were
merely another disposable business venture. And when Trump’s own decisions cost American lives, deplete military
stockpiles and burn through billions of taxpayer dollars, the bill never finds its way to him. It finds its way to us.
Yet the contrast between those who make these decisions and those forced to live with them could hardly be more stark.
While American service members are being returned home in flag-draped coffins, Trump moves from golf courses to galas
to grand spectacles. While the Pentagon scrambles to find the money and munitions, Trump lavishes attention on the
trappings of power, from gilded alterations to the people’s house to extravagant ceremonial projects. While ordinary
Americans struggle with inflation, instability and the cascading costs of his policies, Trump presides over the
pageantry of the presidency seemingly untouched by the consequences. And while the American people are told to
sacrifice, Trump’s family continues converting access to presidential power into extraordinary private wealth. Trump
reported more than $1.4 billion in income from his family’s cryptocurrency ventures in 2025, while Reuters calculated
that the family added at least $2.3 billion to its fortune through its principal crypto businesses after Trump
returned to the presidency. The problem is not merely one of appearances. It is that Trump remains conspicuously
insulated from the human and financial consequences of his own decisions. That insulation from consequence is matched by
a swaggering display of bluster and bravado that passes for leadership within the Trump administration. Take Pete
Hegseth, the self-styled “Secretary of War,” who speaks less like a civilian entrusted with the grave responsibility
of war and peace than a character delivering an action-movie threat. “If you kill Americans, we will hunt you
down,” Hegseth warned. The Trump administration has embraced that threat as a statement of national resolve: anyone
who kills an American will be hunted down and made to pay. Unless, of course, the Americans are killed by their own
government. Unless they are service members sent to die in a preemptive war the president started without constitutional
authority and cannot seem to end. Unless they are shot by immigration agents or police officers conditioned to treat
fear, resistance and the mere presence of a weapon as a license to kill. Unless they die in government custody. Unless
they become casualties of public-health safeguards weakened by mass firings, budget cuts, political interference and
administrative incompetence. In those cases, no one is hunted down, no one in power is made to pay, and no one is held
responsible. This is the double standard that passes for justice in the American Police State. Yet this culture of
official impunity did not begin with Donald Trump. For decades, presidents of both parties have expanded executive
power, surrendered constitutional checks, protected government agents from meaningful accountability and conditioned the
public to accept official violence as the unavoidable price of security. Trump inherited that machinery. He has also
embraced its deadliest powers, accelerated its abuses and made the elimination of accountability a governing principle.
The Iran war is merely the latest—and most visible—example. American service members are dying in a war that is not
making America safer, no matter what Trump insists to the contrary. Seventeen American service members have reportedly
been killed in the war, while more than 400 have been injured. Rather than treating those deaths as evidence of the
terrible costs and strategic failures of his war, Trump has used them to justify further escalation, warning that Iran
will “pay many times over” for every American life lost. This is how endless wars become unending. Every American
death becomes a reason to continue the war that caused it. Every retaliation generates another retaliation. Every
escalation becomes the excuse for another escalation. Every failure is rebranded as a reason to stay the course. The
president starts the war. The military carries it out. American service members die in it. And the public is told that
questioning the wisdom or legality of the conflict is tantamount to betraying the troops. This is not a strategy for
peace. It is a self-perpetuating cycle of death, vengeance and political evasion. Trump’s response to the mounting
casualties has not been restraint, transparency or a serious accounting of how the country became trapped in another
Middle Eastern war. It has been more threats, more bombs, more chest-beating and more demands that the American people
fall in line—and not even a glimmer of ownership for the mistakes that landed us here. Meanwhile, the dead become
justification for still more death. The failures become justification for still more money. And those who made the
decisions remain insulated from the consequences. Yet the Iran war is only one front in the government’s longstanding
war on accountability. The same culture of impunity that shields presidents from responsibility for unconstitutional
wars also protects government agents from meaningful scrutiny when raids, detentions and uses of force result in injury
or death. Nowhere is that more visible than in the Trump administration’s increasingly militarized approach to
immigration enforcement. Federal immigration agents carry out raids in masks, tactical gear and unmarked vehicles. They
detain people at homes, workplaces, traffic stops and routine immigration appointments. Record numbers of people are
being arrested and warehoused in detention centers, many of them with no criminal history. The Trump administration
calls this law enforcement. But law enforcement without transparency, restraint or accountability quickly becomes
something far more dangerous. In recent weeks, ICE agents have fatally shot men in Texas and Maine, prompting senators
to demand body cameras, visible identification, clearer use-of-force rules and greater transparency about who is being
entrusted with the power to kill. Both men were reportedly shot in their vehicles. Neither was the intended target of
the enforcement action. Neither encounter was captured on an officer’s body camera. A temporary pause in ICE traffic
stops reportedly lasted only one day before the White House intervened and ordered the operations resumed. That is the
Trump administration’s idea of accountability: pause briefly, manage the fallout, and then allow the machinery to
continue operating as before. There is no meaningful independent review. There is no public accounting of what went
wrong. There is no assurance that deadly force will be treated as a last resort rather than an acceptable consequence of
aggressive enforcement. Instead, the government investigates itself, controls the evidence, shapes the official
narrative, and moves on. The government kills. The government investigates. The government absolves itself. This is not
unique to immigration enforcement. The same pattern has defined policing in America for decades. Police officers are
trained to perceive threats everywhere and to treat their subjective fear as more important than the objective
constitutional rights of the people they serve. Reach for your wallet and you may be shot. Hold a cellphone and you may
be shot. Fail to obey confusing or contradictory commands quickly enough and you may be shot. Possess a firearm—even
lawfully—and the government may argue that the exercise of your Second Amendment rights made you sufficiently
dangerous to kill. Then the legal system steps in to prevent a jury from ever weighing what happened. Qualified
immunity, judicial deference and doctrines that elevate “officer safety” above almost every competing constitutional
consideration have helped create a system in which government agents can use deadly force and avoid meaningful scrutiny
afterward. Trump did not create this system. Police militarization, qualified immunity, aggressive federal enforcement
and institutional self-protection were firmly entrenched long before he returned to office. What Trump has done is
intensify those tendencies, remove restraints, reward aggression and treat demands for accountability as attacks on law
enforcement itself. The result is a system in which the greater the government’s power, the smaller the consequences
for its abuse. The police state does not have to pull a trigger to put lives at risk. It can also endanger the public by
weakening the safeguards designed to prevent avoidable harm. Public-health agencies, food inspectors,
disease-surveillance programs, medical researchers and drug-safety personnel exist because failures in these areas can
have deadly consequences. When those protections are weakened, risks increase. When expertise is driven out, warnings
are missed. When oversight disappears, preventable crises become more likely. The Trump administration’s mass firings,
funding cuts and political interference have hollowed out critical public-health and food-safety agencies. The Food and
Drug Administration reportedly lost thousands of employees in 2025 and hundreds more in 2026. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the Food Safety and Inspection Service and other agencies responsible for protecting the public
have also undergone substantial staffing reductions. Foreign food-facility inspections have fallen to historic lows
following layoffs and budget cuts, even as the American food supply becomes more global, complex and difficult to
monitor. Programs that track and respond to emerging disease threats have also been scaled back. These are not abstract
bureaucratic changes. They determine whether contaminated food and unsafe drugs are identified before people are harmed,
whether emerging diseases are contained before they spread, and whether qualified experts are available before a
manageable threat becomes a national crisis. No government can eliminate every danger or prevent every death, but when
an administration knowingly strips away safeguards, disregards expert warnings and replaces competence with loyalty, it
cannot pretend that the resulting harm has nothing to do with its decisions. Accountability requires recognizing that
policy choices have foreseeable consequences—and asking who ordered the cuts, ignored the warnings, benefited from
dismantling oversight and will answer when the public is harmed. Yet when those consequences arrive, no one in power
accepts responsibility. The victims and their families are left to absorb the consequences, while the officials who made
the decisions retreat behind bureaucracy, immunity and plausible deniability. The same machinery of official impunity
operates across administrations and agencies. What distinguishes Trump is the speed with which his administration has
dismantled remaining safeguards, dismissed expertise and treated accountability as an obstacle to power. The pattern is
the same whether the harm occurs on a battlefield, during an immigration raid, in a police encounter or through the
failure of an institution charged with protecting the public. Those with power make the decisions. Those without power
bear the consequences. This is how official impunity becomes a system of government. Presidents claim immunity. Congress
surrenders its constitutional responsibilities. Military officials classify their mistakes. Federal agencies investigate
themselves. Police officers invoke qualified immunity. Prosecutors protect government agents. Courts keep juries from
weighing the evidence. Corporations profit from government contracts. Officials leave public service for lucrative
private-sector positions with the very industries they once oversaw. Taxpayers pay every settlement, bailout,
reconstruction cost and replenishment bill. The names and political parties change. The machinery of impunity remains.
What distinguishes Trump is not that he created this machinery but the brazenness with which he uses it. He treats
oversight as obstruction, criticism as disloyalty, constitutional restraints as inconveniences, and public office as a
vehicle for private power and profit. Under Trump, the buck stops nowhere. Every consequence is transferred to someone
else. No one in power pays a personal price. No one admits fault. No one resigns. No one is prosecuted. No one is held
accountable. Instead, the public is told to move on. The policies continue. The machinery rolls forward. This is how
temporary abuses become permanent powers. It is how republics become empires. It is how elected public servants become
rulers who answer to no one. And it is how a government learns that it can inflict enormous harm without ever being
required to pay a price. Trump and Hegseth insist that anyone who kills an American will be hunted down and made to pay.
Yet who demands accountability when the decisions that cost American lives originate in the White House? Who answers for
the service members sent to die in an unconstitutional war launched without meaningful public debate or congressional
authorization? Who answers for those who die during immigration raids, police encounters or government detention? Who
answers when those in power enrich themselves while everyone else is left to bear the danger, instability and cost? In
the American Police State, the answer is almost always the same: Those in power are protected. Those without power bear
the consequences. The government operates above the law. Those who wield power become untouchable. Those who suffer are
treated as disposable. Justice becomes whatever the government says it is. And the machinery of government moves on
without accountability. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and its
fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, that is how the American Police State gets away with murder. This article
was originally published on The Rutherford Institute. Copyright © The Rutherford Institute The Odyssey and the Tiresome
Woke War Against White CultureCircling and Spiraling Donate Please Donate To Support LRC Political Theatre Do Not
Consent Col Douglas Macgregor: Iran May Seize Kuwait on the Ground Florida Deploys Drones At Schools To Prevent
Shootings, Considers Equipping Trash Trucks With AI Cameras To Scan Properties For Code Violations Leaked Iran War
Information Cover Up Unravels as Pentagon Admits Nearly 100 Injured in Iran Strikes Read more Political TheatreLRC Blog
What’s REALLY Going On In DC, With Guest Sen. Rand Paul! As Oil HIts $100, Houthis Open New Front In Iran War
Frustrated Trump Vows To Hit Iranian Infrastructure Longtime Vegas Resident Robert Barnes Discusses the Evolution of Las
Vegas as the Rosetta Stone of Organized Crime The New Face of Patriotism Read more LRC Blog Privacy Policy